top of page
Innovative, low cost, nature based tech with an invasive aspect of modernity removed.
Money as a barrier to innovation. When profit is involved two concerns arise—ease and/or overly complex high tech that cannot be mimicked without more money or resources. What does this mean for technological evolution?
Reflect on the following technologies
What happens if the technologies represented above are reinvented with the purpose of empowering nature—biodiversity, regeneration—working with nature instead of against it? What happens if we remove profit and ease as a driving force?
bottom of page